Property scope
Confirm every covered building, shared system, component, quantity, association responsibility, and excluded area against current governing and property records.
A study becomes useful when its assumptions, funding schedule, project priorities, board decisions, and resident communication are connected in one visible operating plan.
Do not reduce the study to one annual contribution number. First establish what was inspected, what assumptions support the schedule, what changed since the inspection, and which decisions must be made now.
Confirm every covered building, shared system, component, quantity, association responsibility, and excluded area against current governing and property records.
Record inspection dates, observed condition, recent failures, active repairs, warranties, prior reports, and any inaccessible areas or assumptions.
Identify components near the end of estimated life and test whether completed repairs, deterioration, exposure, or changed use affects the assumption.
Understand the estimate date, escalation, design and permitting allowances, access conditions, contingencies, and whether related enabling work is included.
Reconcile regular assessments, existing reserves, approved special assessments, and any financing assumptions with the latest professional schedule.
Capture what the board adopted, the alternatives considered, professional input, delegated authority, communication plan, and next review date.
Florida Statutes §718.112 describes current reserve and Structural Integrity Reserve Study requirements for covered condominium associations, including study content, funding schedules, possible funding methods, updates, and reporting. Applicability depends on the building and association facts.
Review the current text of Florida Statutes §718.112 and current Florida DBPR condominium guidance. This summary is not legal, engineering, accounting, financing, or reserve-study advice.
| Window | Leadership focus | Evidence to produce | Decision gate |
|---|---|---|---|
| Days 0–15 | Log receipt, confirm distribution obligations, preserve the study, and identify scope questions. | Controlled study copy, component register, question log, communication owner. | Is urgent inspection, repair, or professional clarification required? |
| Days 15–30 | Reconcile reserves, current budget, approved work, contracts, and cash timing. | Funding bridge from current position to recommended schedule. | Do current contributions and planned funding align? |
| Days 30–60 | Sequence projects, validate assumptions, obtain specialist input, and model owner impact. | Priority matrix, option brief, procurement and communication plan. | Which funding and project path is ready for decision? |
| Days 60–90 | Record decisions, assign owners, launch approved work, and establish reporting cadence. | Board resolution, action roadmap, dashboard, owner update. | What evidence will prove implementation is on track? |
A funding method is not simply a finance choice. It changes cash timing, approvals, owner communication, project sequencing, interest exposure, and the evidence leadership must monitor.
Build a decision brief that shows current balances, required uses, forecast contributions, assessment timing, borrowing assumptions, project dependencies, and downside scenarios. Ask legal, accounting, reserve, tax, lending, and engineering professionals to address the questions within their disciplines.
Confirm the study scope and assumptions, reconcile its funding schedule with the current budget and cash position, identify decisions requiring professional input, assign owners and dates, communicate the adopted direction, and monitor the plan against actual projects and costs.
No. A reserve study estimates component life, cost, and funding needs. A project plan adds scope, procurement, permitting, scheduling, contract controls, resident communication, and evidence of completion.
Ask the qualified reserve professional and other appropriate specialists whether material changes in condition, useful life, cost, project timing, or funding method require an update. Keep the operating plan aligned with the current professional basis.
No. It is an operational governance framework. Florida law, governing documents, accounting, engineering, reserve-study, financing, and tax questions require appropriately qualified professionals.